Comparison
MAILCast vs. conventional e-mail clients
We frequently found companies using standard e-mail tools for managing their e-communications. The vast majority use a plain conventional e-mail client such as Microsoft Outlook, or even a e-mailing desktop application installed in their user's PCs.
Let's compare a few MAILCast features with that of those general purpose tools:
| MAILCast | Conv. Tool | |
|---|---|---|
| Distributed content creation |
X |
- |
| By-stages content creation |
X |
- |
| Automatic composing |
X |
|
| E-mail delivery capabilities |
Tens of thousands |
Dozens |
| Delivery scheduling |
X |
- |
| Avoid corporate server and lines saturation |
X |
- |
| Bounced-back management |
X |
- |
| External data source integration |
X |
Limited |
| Segmentation and filtering |
X |
Limited |
| Reading stats |
X |
- |
| Click-throug stats |
X |
- |
| RSS export and reuse |
X |
- |
| Website integration |
X |
- |
| Subscriptions stats |
X |
- |
| RSS use stats |
X |
- |
| News reading stats |
X |
- |
Related entries in our blog that you may find useful:
